Lies of the United Nation and Cannabis
|
|
Plant or Pills |
On March 25, 1972, the Final Act to the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961, as Amended by the 1972 Protocol Amendment, was signed. Although not self-executing, the provisions of the Single Convention must be incorporated into the domestic law by legislative acts in the signing party's country.
The Preamble to this International treaty, states the aim, purpose and justification for the Convention:
"PREAMBLE
The Parties,
Concerned with the health and welfare of mankind,
Recognizing that the medical use of narcotic drugs continues to
be indispensable for the relief of pain and suffering and that adequate
provision must be made to ensure the availability of narcotic drugs for
such purposes,
Recognizing that addiction to narcotic drugs constitutes a
serious evil for the individual and is fraught with social and economic
danger to mankind,
Conscious of their duty to prevent and combat this evil,
Considering that effective measures against the abuse of
narcotic drugs require co-ordinated and universal action,
Understanding that such universal action calls for international
co-operation guided by the same principles and aimed at common
objectives,
Acknowledging the
competence of the United Nations in the field of narcotics control
and desirous that the international organs concerned should be within
the framework of that Organization,
Desiring to conclude a generally acceptable international
convention replacing existing treaties on narcotic drugs,
limiting such drugs to medical and scientific use, and providing
for continuous international co-operation and control for the
achievement of such aims and objectives,
Hereby agree" ... to Articles 1 - 50 and the four
schedules appended, all of which comprise the International Treaty on
Drug Control.
Article 1 provides for Definitions applicable and used
throughout the Convention;
Article 2 describes the Substances Under Control and within each
schedule and the method of control applicable.
Schedule 1 includes cannabis and is subject to all measures of
control applicable to drugs under the
Convention.
Schedule IV drugs, also included in Schedule 1, subject to all
measures of control "including adopting special measures of control which are
necessary having regard to the particularly dangerous properties
of those drugs ..."
Article 28 - CONTROL OF CANNABIS
1. If a Party permits the cultivation of the cannabis plant for the
production of cannabis or cannabis resin, it shall apply thereto the
system of controls as provided in article 23 (licensing
requirements) respecting the control of the opium poppy.
2. This Convention shall not apply to the cultivation of the cannabis
plant exclusively for industrial purposes (fibre and seed) or
horticultural purposes.
3. The Parties shall adopt such measures as may be necessary to prevent
the misuse of, and illicit traffic in, the leaves of the cannabis
plant.
Article 33 - POSSESSION OF DRUGS
The Parties shall not permit the possession of drugs except under
legal authority.
Article 35 - ACTION AGAINST THE ILLICIT TRAFFIC
Having due regard to their constitutional, legal and
administrative systems, ...
Article 36 - PENAL PROVISIONS
1. Subject to its constitutional limitations, ... cultivation,
production, manufacture, extraction, preparation, possession,
offering, offering for sale, distribution, purchase, sale, delivery,
brokerage, dispatch, transport, importation and exportation ... shall
be punishable offences ... and that serious offences shall be liable
to adequate punishment particularly by imprisonment or other penalties
of deprivation of liberty
2. ...as an alternative to conviction or in addition to, the Parties
may provide treatment, education, aftercare, rehabilitation and social
integration ..
Compare the above to the following:
Compare the above to the following:
In reviewing the minutes to a 1971 United Nation 'symposium' discussing the research
surrounding the chemistry and biological activity of cannabis, the following was noted:
Cannabis research at the Division of Narcotic Drugs, United Nations, Geneva is mandated with the primary function of internationally coordinating cannabis research in order to avoid unnecessary duplication of effort.
The emphasis of this international research was "to elucidate the effects of the compounds responsible for the psychoactive effects of cannabis in man, to quantify the constituents or their metabolites in biological fluids, to determine their toxicity and side effects and to correlate these data with the social effects of the drug."
Respecting the large number of new and unpublished data surrounding the positive findings from researching cannabis:
The Symposium revealed that a large amount of knowledge had been accumulated on the chemistry of cannabis and the synthesis of the cannabinoids and their metabolites. The report stated that there still remains some uncertainty as to how much THC is absorbed by smoking, to give the biological high. It concluded that THC and cannabis of known potency can be used with confidence in large scale clinical trials. It was determined that within the next few years (by 1975 ?), the clinical data will shed new light on the two basic questions of the UN "How dangerous is cannabis?" and "What should we do about it?"
In summary, this is evidence that the United Nations vilified cannabis without any corroborating scientific evidence as to its dangers!
How can a plant go from a useful industrial and medicinal benefit to society, to a fate of condemnation needing international control under the suspicious auspices of protecting our health?
Cannabis research at the Division of Narcotic Drugs, United Nations, Geneva is mandated with the primary function of internationally coordinating cannabis research in order to avoid unnecessary duplication of effort.
The emphasis of this international research was "to elucidate the effects of the compounds responsible for the psychoactive effects of cannabis in man, to quantify the constituents or their metabolites in biological fluids, to determine their toxicity and side effects and to correlate these data with the social effects of the drug."
Respecting the large number of new and unpublished data surrounding the positive findings from researching cannabis:
The Symposium revealed that a large amount of knowledge had been accumulated on the chemistry of cannabis and the synthesis of the cannabinoids and their metabolites. The report stated that there still remains some uncertainty as to how much THC is absorbed by smoking, to give the biological high. It concluded that THC and cannabis of known potency can be used with confidence in large scale clinical trials. It was determined that within the next few years (by 1975 ?), the clinical data will shed new light on the two basic questions of the UN "How dangerous is cannabis?" and "What should we do about it?"
In summary, this is evidence that the United Nations vilified cannabis without any corroborating scientific evidence as to its dangers!
How can a plant go from a useful industrial and medicinal benefit to society, to a fate of condemnation needing international control under the suspicious auspices of protecting our health?

Comments